Episode 1: Marbury v. Madison (judicial review), Fletcher v. Peck (private property), McCulloch v. Maryland("necessary and proper"), Worcester v. Georgia (tribes), Dred Scott v. Sandford（slavery黑历史） Episode 2: Civil Rights Cases(dissenter Harlan), Stephen Johnson Field (Liberty of Contract), Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Lochner v. New York (labor law) Episode 3: Hugo Black, Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright (provide an attorney), Brown v. Board of Education (高法几乎是以一己之力挑战种族歧视政策) Episode 4: United States v. Alfonso D. Lopez (set limits to Congress' power under the Commerce Clause), William Rehnquist (Judicial supremacy), Bush v. Gore, https://www.supremecourt.gov/
Episode 1: Marbury v. Madison (judicial review), Fletcher v. Peck (private property), McCulloch v. Maryland("necessary and proper"), Worcester v. Georgia (tribes), Dred Scott v. Sandford（slavery黑历史） Episode 2: Civil Rights Cases(dissenter Harlan), Stephen Johnson Field (Liberty of Contract), Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Lochner v. New York (labor law) Episode 3: Hugo Black, Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright (provide an attorney), Brown v. Board of Education (高法几乎是以一己之力挑战种族歧视政策) Episode 4: United States v. Alfonso D. Lopez (set limits to Congress' power under the Commerce Clause), William Rehnquist (Judicial supremacy), Bush v. Gore, https://www.supremecourt.gov/
2014/9/10 Excellent documentary that carries weight. I was brought to tears many times at the landmark decisions.
不偏不倚
片长有限，只能涵盖几个主要事件。
顺便介绍一本书《法官能为民主做什么》，一样精彩
还不错吧，信息量挺大，作为纪录片是合格的，但没有让人震撼的感觉。